So much wrong stems from feminism, it would be fair to call it the Mother of All Evil. In essence, feminism is sexism and hateful bigotry against men, but its ills don’t end there. The way feminism promotes desertion of ages old bonds between men and women and abolition of women’s needs and priorities from their natural balances, negatively affects all aspects of our lives.

Luckily, not all women are so braindead as to fall for the pretext of “equality between the sexes“. It doesn’t take a genius to recognize that men and women are different for a reason. We were never meant to be equal. To the contrary, we were made to be opposites that complement each other. You were built for this, I was built for that, together we can do it all, including things neither of us could do without complementing the opposite.

I said it before and will say it again – chivalry and gallantry are hard to come by these days, because women worthy of it are impossible to find. They are being overpowered by narcistic, borderline psychotic feminists blindly subscribed to the insidious men-hating ideology that has neither moral authority nor intellectual legitimacy.

Feminism is not only anti-father and anti-male but also anti-mother, anti-child and anti-woman. Feminists hate women who are so dedicated to their husbands and children they would stay at home to manage their households. Through manipulative spread of insidious half-truth, feminists jump on “victimisation” or “exploitation” screaming bandwagons all the while sacrifices made by husbands and fathers are intentionally left out of the picture.

Feminism directly resulted in destruction of family and community and replaced them with widespread utilization of state bureaucracies. As a result our children grow up confused, lacking stable family ties and properly developed ideals of adulthood. Young girls are conditioned to perceive men as threats to their safety and dignity.

The Power of Community

It wasn’t until I left to go far, far away from home and got a chance to experience simple lifestyle while living with simple people that I got a real glimpse of how much we’ve lost in terms of family and community. I got a glimpse of what it’s like when a community comes together and pulls together as one for good of them all – for real, not as part of fancy rhetoric.

Whereas in societies I came from people only and solely feed their own selfishness and limit engagement in community service to times when it benefits them in some way, in real communities personal interests come after the community and selfishness is inherently nonexistent. In a real community, those most skilled in hunting hunt, those good with baking bake, those good in weaving make products to trade with other tribes while those who understand the powers of healing assist the ones who fell sick.

In a real community, a man doesn’t go hunting motivated by a desire to return home with a catch bigger than his neighbor’s to drive their envy through the roof. In a real community, a woman doesn’t put on shinier lipstick, stronger perfume and shorter skirt than her colleague to ensure that she gets more attention. In a real community, you are there for everyone and everyone is there for you.

In a real community, no individual member needs to protect themselves against another because there is never any bad blood. If you were to visit a native tribe living far away from civilization somewhere in a rainforest, you’d notice that all houses are the same size. In some tribes, chief tribesman may have a house larger than everyone else but everybody wants it that way because he’s been chosen to be a chief and with it, he bears more responsibility. That leaves no room for greed and selfishness therefore you would never encounter any form of crime of one member against another.

But you really don’t have to look all the way to uncontacted tribes deep in a rainforest to see strong community with unshakable families and zero crime. You have them in your own backyard – they are the Amish, the Hutterites, the Mennonites or whatever other name they may go by. There has never in their entire existence been a case of murder or theft among members of their communities. Do you think you’d find any form of feminism in their ranks?

Feminism is not empowering. Support for feminism shows you are feeble minded and have failed in your most natural role as a woman, the caregiver.

Role of the Woman

Men have historically achieved greater things than women, but that’s because they had their women supporting them every step of their way. By knowing their place and sticking with it, the women were the driving force behind the achievements. A man knew that even if whole world turned against him, he could come home and there find his woman who didn’t care one bit what the entire rest of the world thought. She was always there for him, always on his side. That man would do anything for his woman.

But then the feminists came and poisoned the world with their toxic minds. All of a sudden they felt like they needed to go against the natural order of things and do the man’s work. A woman who used to be there for the man and stood always by him, suddenly turned against him and used her body to undermine his position. And just as leftists invented word “bigot” and Zionists word “Anti-Semite”, feminists came up with their own labels to plaster all over everyone who didn’t agree with them.

What feminists don’t understand is that the natural role of a woman is not demeaning. It’s honorable and respectable. It’s also the most desirable and necessary for our basic survival. What’s despicable is women dishing their natural role for a role that’s unnatural and contra productive.

Bear mothers are known for being the most overprotective of their young in the animal kingdom. This is because hungry male bears could turn on little cubs and confuse them for easy snack. Can you imagine if bear population was plagued by feminism the same way human population is and bear mothers would refuse their natural role of an overprotective mother because they’d feel they should have the right to act like male bears and eat little cubs for snack? This whole idea is so absurd it hurts to even put it into a sentence, yet that is exactly what is happening with humans. Human females have gone ape shit and are wreaking havoc on the entire population, weakening the minds of men and turning them into zombified, pussy whipped losers. Feminism is the root cause of many of today’s ills that did not exist in the past and should be put to a swift and violent end.

Instead of condemning single mothers and spitting them in the face like they deserve, we have been pussy whipped to empower them and encourage them in bringing their offspring up to be just as despicably pussy whipped. If we want to survive as a species, we need to cleanse the planet of feminism. Leave none behind. Feminism is a plague that ought to be treated as one.

Statistics on “Powerless” Women

The notion that women are “powerless victims” is so fundamentally absurd, it needs special address in this article. Here are a few stats:

• Women live on average seven years longer than men
• Women make up 55% of college graduates
• Women cast 54% of the votes in elections
• Women win almost automatically in child custody disputes
• Women suffer only 6% of the work-related fatalities (94% are suffered by men)
• Women are the victim of only about 35% of violent crimes
• Women are the victim of only about 25% of all murders
• Special legislation has been passed to punish “violence against women” as if “violence against men” was not quite up to par
• Two out of every three dollars spent on health care is spent on women
• Of the 25 worst jobs, as ranked by the Jobs Related Almanac based on a combination of salary, stress, security, and physical demands, 24 of them are predominantly, if not almost entirely, male
• Men commit over 80% of all suicides

Powerless victims? I think not!

This also demonstrates more clearly what I mean when I said that rape has been so demonized by feminists, every lesser man jumps on it like it’s the worst crime of all. Yet victims of beatings, vast majority of whom are men suffer far longer lasting consequences, both physical and mental yet not only is this crime deemed less severe and is prosecuted less harshly, the society also treats victims like they’re some kind of softies unable to put on good fights. Let’s admit it – when it comes to demonization of rape, we’ve all been brain-bleached by the feminists so much we’ve lost touch with reality and fail to put things in perspective.

Adria Richards

Best Gore member Hawk hooked me up with videos of this despicable woman by the name of Adria Richards whose existence shows just how immoral and destructive feminism is. This bitch, who despite being a woman is a degenerate that would rather pretend she’s a computer tech attended a Python programming conference named PyCon hosted by pussy whipped lesser men. Behind this degenerate sat normal men one of whom made a remark about a dongle. The degenerate overheard it and decided that men talking about dongles (which is a common name for USB storage devices) at a conference creates environment unwelcoming toward women.

And so Adria Richards took photo of the men and posted it with a whine line on Twitter. To make long story short, pussy whipped organizers of PyCon escorted the men out, while one of the man’s pussy whipped employer terminated his employment. Have I said it yet – feminism is a plague!

Feminists aka degenerate women like this Adria Richards need to be spat in the face and thrown in a pit with hungry rats. It really is not surprising so many men look for women outside of their home countries. It’s not that they can’t find a good woman at home. It’s because they live in a feminism plagued society so they’re looking for a woman, who as a woman should be a loyal friend and partner who’s always there for him and stands on his side even if whole world turned against him. Good luck finding a woman who understands her importance in a relationship in a feminism whipped society.

Back to Dongle Gate – here’s a funny summary:

A more harsh reality summary:

PS – I will elaborate on the involvement of evil Zio in forcing feminism down the throats of western people in another post. Like every other major negative change our society has undergone in the last 100 years, feminism is also in its depths a creation of the Jew. Feminism is so fundamentally wrong, western people would not embrace it on such cellular level without major promotion and brainwash from the Zionist occupied media. But that will be a topic for another post, otherwise this one would be too long.

Vincit Omnia Veritas,

Mark

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• best gore videos rape
• best gore rape photo
• mexican rape videos best gore
• video violente gore
• graphic gore girl on a stick
• www bestgore com/rape
• best gore suiside
• rape best video
• rape videos on best gore
• dead rape victim pics

I absolutely agree with Best Gore member Hawk who said: “I hope this video is used as evidence to get her fired. Women being cops think that feminism means they are above the law. Dumb Cunt bitch.”

What this power tripping Cincinnati female cop demonstrated is that because she’s a cop, you as a citizen waive all your rights because when she’s around, you have no right to have rights and must therefore give yourself in to her will or else she’ll arrest you. Absolutely despicable. People like her must be terminated from police immediately without pension. Not a penny more of people’s taxes must be used on this toxic waste of a snatch.

Props to Best Gore member Hawk for the video:

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• why do cops think they are above the law
• to gore when cop video
• brain fart best gore
• best gore police brutality
• cops think they are above the law
• police gore photos
• lady cop throw her ass on black dick
• police brutatlity pictures
• Power Tripping Cincinnati Female Cop Thinks She Is Above the Law
• tlc left eye striping xvideos

This video alleges to show Smash Mouth bassist Paul DeLisle assaulting his wife in the shower and well… smashing her mouth. At least that’s what the aftermath of the scuffle seems to look like.

I don’t know if this is for real or some kind of bad joke fugazi promo shit (Smash Mouth bassist smashes his wife’s mouth?) but if I were to live with a whiney golddigger that films vertically with an Iphone, I’d probably want to smash her mouth too.

Another thing is – Paul DeLisle appears to realize that his wife is filming him allegedly assaulting her and appears to want to get the phone off her so he can erase the evidence, but eventually gives up and does nothing about it. For someone who’s semi famous, do you really think he’d let his wife get away with filming him and not go through hell and back to make sure the video is deleted? He’s had the phone at arm’s length this whole time.

Either way, I hope he quickly divorced the golddigger without settlement. If she can’t appreciate what she has, kick the bitch out. In the age plagued by Feminism, women who are there for their men, not against him are hard to find. Especially in the west.

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• vidéos best gore tortures
• War female torture videos
• women abuse best gore
• bestgrori com
• best gore holes in the head
• video genuine female torture
• smash mouth bassist video
• real torture death videos
• shit in wifes mouth video
• smash mouth drummer beats wife

A scuffle between the ghetto’s finest involves two mouthy hoodrats that no male had the balls to uppercut like they deserved. Bitches vented their yaps, clearly abusing the fact that most males, despite having just as many reasons to be pissed off at them would not resort to physically hurting a woman cause that’s never a fair fight.

But fucken bitches just wouldn’t quit it. The scuffle remained on high with bitches continuing the provoke while pimps held each other back. Despite repeat attacks on the males, they kept their cool and threw no uppercuts. Eventually the skank that probably paid for the BMW by whoring herself out rammed one of the guys, running him partially over before dashing off.

Uppercuts exist for a reason. A real man would never hit a woman, but feminists are not women. They are degenerates whose birth certificates are an apology from the condom factory. They are the culmination of years of major genetic mishaps. They are as useless as rubber lips on a woodpecker. They exist solely to spread ignorance unless you consider being a warning to others a purpose in life. The only people able share the same point of view as the feminists are the ones with their heads deep up their own asses. A man worth his salt will never hit a woman, but should beat the ignorance out of the feminists for they give our fine women a bad name.

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• truck runs over man
• brutal beating vid
• ran over by truck photos
• run over and crushed under
• over truck
• kids get runned over by truck gore
• truck running over a mans head
• truck runs over family
• www bestgore com feminism
• truck runs over head

While visiting a fair trade in Hanover, Germany with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Russian president Vladimir Putin was confronted by topless demonstrators from the women’s rights group Femen who called him a dictator. As you know, what feminists refer to as “women’s rights” is really promotion of hatred toward men and preferential treatment for abusers of the privilege to bear children.

The look on Putin’s face as he locked his stare at the girl’s tits is priceless. Those bitches need to be dick slapped and cum choked so they don’t speak no more. And once silenced, they need to be explained what the word “dictator” actually means.

Femen have a presence in each pussy whipped country and lately made protesting detention of the feminist punk band Pussy Riot so popular, even deranged Brazilian feminists jumped on the bandwagon. Dick choke those bitches shut, Da Silvas!

Best Gore member Hawk says:

Boobs! Boobs attack Putin. Sweet. Badass Putin, look at his face and reaction compared to Merkel. Steel nerves of a KGB agent.

Putin is hated by Zionist Jews and Israel because:

1. He supports Iran and Syria rights and does not support Israel plans of more land stealing
2. Because they kicked the Jews from power in their country
3. Because Putin is against Gay rights and instead supports traditional values
4. Because he promote Christianity and Zionist Jews hate it

Props to Hawk for the videos:

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• best gore dictators
• strangle wank best gore
• amanda todd boobs and autopsy
• amanda todd boobs bestgore
• amanda todd boobs bestgore com
• amanda todd tits bestgore
• angela merkel and putin badasses
• best gore boobies of the day
• merkel tits fuck

Can single mothers get any more pathetic? Oh yes, they can!

Typical hood rat single mother Obama voter. Loud and mouthy, making her general existence a nuisance. Her kid doesn’t even react to its mother yelling like it’s a normal part of its average day.

Worst thing is – single mother is a failed woman. This bitch is gonna spawn another 5 kids and they will all grow up being mirror images of their mother, all the while she will whine on Facebook about how despite her being a single mother, her kids turned out OK (always gives me a chuckle when single mothers do that – in denial for the rest of their days). And with all those kids in tow, she’ll receive hefty child support money so she’ll have enough time to ride around in public transport buses to yell at people, toss her kids around and jump into fights. Tax payers will foot for that.

The single mother argument:

Says: “Don’t disrespect me in front of my baby” then shows how much she respects her baby by tossing it like trash.

Props to Best Gore member NuvosOrdo for the video:

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• child baby pussys
• aftar the chaild in pusi photo
• women throw baby to fight on bus
• woman throws her baby to fight on bus
• woman throws child on bus
• woman throws baby on bus
• public sexual nuisance
• old lady letting herself be fucked and cum in cunt too pay rent
• mouthy women
• mother fails

Disgraceful pairs of underdeveloped labia like these give women a bad name. Lipstick Bounty Hunters? Really? Let’s hope that next time around these filthy fucking lowlifes mess with someone who doesn’t give a shit that they are females and will carve a permanent fist sized depressions in their stupid mugs.

In cases like this, I’m in complete favor of equality – give bitches equally harsh beating you would give to a man. Go full strength uppercut on the whore. For too long have bitches abused their position and given nothing in return. It’s time to turn the tides and meet disrespect with equal disrespect. In times when there are no women worthy of chivalry left, the time for mighty uppercuts is long overdue.

35 year old Daniel Duvall was allegedly wanted for failing to pay a $4,000 bail bondsman tab. Group of disgraceful pairs of underdeveloped labia who call themselves Lipstick Bounty Hunters saw it as an opportunity to show off and attacked him at an Arby’s like they were in a movie, causing grievous bodily harm, landing themselves a lawsuit for using excessive force.

During the confrontation at the Huntington Beach Arby’s, Lipstick Bounty Hunters broke Daniel Duvall’s nose, blinded him in one eye with a rubber bullet and left him with bruises and cuts on his body.

Daniel Duvall’s lawyer Dan Gilleon accused the female thugs of thuggery and planned to file a multi-million dollar suit against them. Good – they have no right to assault someone and justify it by saying that they “thought” he was dangerous. Here’s hoping the lawsuit will bankrupt the shit out of them so they end up in the street like the filthy cockroaches that they are. They fail as bounty hunters anyway – Daniel Duvall was shot with at least eight rubber bullets, along with a pepper blaster and a stun gun and still managed to escape. Bitches should never have left the kitchen.

Props to Best Gore member Hawk for the videos:

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• lipstick bounty hunters
• dead naked man beaten by mob
• gore beating
• www best cow fock com
• beating brutal with a whip
• extreme brutal slut whore bloody fighting videos
• police shoot out fatalities trigger happy
• pics of a woman being tortured
• tortute videos
• naked boys being tortured in pictures

I couldn’t believe what I saw. Multiculturalism is some really scary stuff. I can honestly say I’m glad I don’t live in a city overrun by the diversity’s finest cause that’s just fucking scary to even watch on video, let alone live next to. It reminded me of what I saw in Eastern Europe whereas a Gypsy Agent Provocateur would intentionally stir shit to provoke a response and then a fucking hundred Gypsies would come out of the woodworks to overwhelm the “usurper”.

All I know about this video is that the police were conducting an arrest on the “3″ train at Brooklyn Museum, New York. The man was resisting arrest so backup was called for, which was clearly necessary because whole fucking ghetto seemed to have descended upon the train creating so much tension, you could just fucking smell it. To make matters worse, a fucking hood rat kept sticking her fucking mug in officer’s faces and eventually got arrested too, which sparked the “she’s a female” response from ghetto spectators.

When you get multiculturalism and feminism all at once, it’s pure disaster. So what that she’s a female? Does that give her any right she wouldn’t have if she were a male? Feminists and their ilk of pussy whipped lesser men make me sick.

It’s no secret that I’m not a big fan of police brutality and the police states many western countries have been turned into (although the sheep believe otherwise). But seeing whole ghetto descend upon the train and just itch to turn the incident into a riot (which miraculously didn’t happen this time around) – that was some scary stuff and I must give the cops props for pushing on despite seemingly riot-itchy crowd.

How culturally enriching… More of the diversity’s finest HERE and HERE.

Props to Best Gore member hung like a mouse for the video:

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• worst toture video bestgore com
• uncensored police shooting
• real footage of torture
• real goar com
• torture et vidéos
• tortured wife video
• us marine torture video
• us police violence photo
• video gore 2 girlq
• video torture sexuel

Kids didn’t used to be that way. Kids had been taught respect for hundreds of years. This is a new phenomenon, even new to me who was their age only half a generation ago. So what went wrong? What happened to our societies that our future torch bearers are complete pieces of shit from the moment they can talk?

Family is the most fundamental and important building block of every society. Strong, unshakeable families reflect on a strong, unshakeable society. If you undermine families, you undermine the base on which the society stands and with weak foundation, the society becomes easy to exploit. If they also set us against one another, we get caught up in senseless arguments, completely ignorant of that little fact that the usurer is in plain sight, ripping us off with a smile on his face.

Promotion and encouragement of feminism did hell of a job at that. Whereas in the 1960′s only 11 percent of US children grew up without a father figure in their life, now it’s one third. Feminism breeds single mothers and single mothers in turn breed disrespectful shits and future criminals. When we reach the retirement age, one third of the productive age adults will be single mother’s kids. Can you sense the disaster we are headed for?

Coupled with the growing threat of Liberalism whereas decadence, homosexuality and abortions are encouraged, while traditional values not only discouraged, but criminalized (disciplining of one’s child to bring up a respectful human being), there really is little to look forward to.

The video below was filmed on a bus in Upper Darby Township in Delaware County, Pennsylvania, United States. The kids on the bus raise hell, talk back nasty to the bus councillor, curse her, call her a bitch and lay their hands on her. Absolutely despicable. As if the fact that they live off welfare and child support was not bad enough, single mother also plague those of us who work so they don’t have to by raising these shits that turn people’s day into a ride from hell.

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• best of feminism
• chaos on upper darby bus
• sexual gore jealeos wives with knives

Seldom are there videos that prove the destructiveness of feminism as openly as this one. Look at that disgusting bitch as she smirks into the camera held by a fellow feminist equally indoctrinated to hate all boys and men. Take a look at just how pleased she is being able to beat little boys and kick them away for good measure just because they’re boys and being a feminist, she sees all boys as enemies that must be destroyed. The more she manages to degrade each boy, the more empowered she feels. And as she beats them up, the bitch laughs and generally enjoys herself. And then these bitches go out and protest for women’s rights.

The video is from Mazanovsky children’s orphanage in a rural area of the Amur Region in the far eastern part of Russia. At least three feminist bitches used to regularly administer the beatings to the boys. Some of the abusers were only 16 or 17 years old.

Russian Ombudsman for Children’s Rights Pavel Astakhov said that “this was systematic and there were at least six proven episodes of child torture in the orphanage.”

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• best gore russian nightclub bouncers

First a reality reflection (I would call it a joke, but because feminism is a joke in itself, any such thing as a feminist joke is a division by zero):

Question: How many feminists does it take to screw in a light bulb:
Answer: 12.

1. One to screw it in
2. one to excoriate men for creating the need for illumination
3. one to blame men for inventing such a faulty means of illumination
4. one to suggest the whole “screwing” bit to be too “rape-like”
5. one to deconstruct the lightbulb itself as being phallic
6. one to blame men for not changing the bulb
7. one to blame men for trying to change the bulb instead of letting a woman do it
8. one to blame men for creating a society that discourages women from changing light bulbs
9. one to blame men for creating a society where women change too many light bulbs
10. one to advocate that lightbulb changers should have wage parity with electricians
11. one to alert the media that women are now “out-lightbulbing” men
12. one to just sit there taking pictures for her blog for photo-evidence that men are unnecessary

Feminism: Teaching fish to act like bicycles Since 1963.

At around 4pm on Tuesday May 21, 2013 three days after President Francois Hollande controversially signed gay marriage into law, French historian Dominique Venner walked calmly past hundreds of tourists in Notre Dame cathedral in Paris, stood himself in front of the altar and sacrificed his life by shooting himself in the head with a gun.

Dominique Venner watched his once great country descend to the never before seen level as the ever encroaching Zionism systematically destroyed everything it has been built on, and as Francois Hollande added one of the final nails to the coffin of France, Dominique Venner saw no other way but to take his own life in the name of his country so his sacrifice could serve as a beacon to those who will come after him.

But because his sacrifice was a showcase of ultimate patriotism, it enraged the Zionists who felt compelled to dishonor the legacy of Dominique Venner. And so they sent their minion, a degenerative feminist from the collective of the deranged known around the world as Femen to stand before the same altar at Notre Dame and mimic the patriotic act of Dominique Venner while disgracing his legacy by bearing her breasts and exposing an offensive message written on her filthy skin: “May fascists rest in hell”

Did you know that for their servitude to the Zionists, Femen degenerates receive a salary of about $1000 and the funds come from various Zionist sources, including the Jew Jed Sunden who used the Zio usuries to found the media company KP Media and the Kyiv Post newspaper?

In an article titled “Femen wants to move from public exposure to political power” published in Kyiv Post on April 29, 2010 Jed Sunden admitted to financing Femen:

I confirm that I do give money to Femen, I will not state the amount. After meeting with Anna Hutsol, I was impressed with her ideas and have been a supporter.

Feminism was introduced and forced into our lived by the Jews. It really is not surprising that all top feminist leaders are Jewish – Andrea Dworkin, Betty Friedan, Eve Ensler, Gloria Steinem, Rosa Luxemburg, Andrea Bronfman, Bella Abzug, Blu Greenberg, Brenda Howard, Arlene Raven, Biz Hahn, Betty Comden, Cathy Young, Clara Fox, Elfriede Jelinek, Ellen Willis, Emily Mehlman, Gertrude Stein, Gloria Allred, Grace Paley, Hanne Blank, Helen Cohen, Jean Rothernberg and many others. Do you think it is a coincidence that they are all Jews?

Speaking of feminist Helen Cohen, here’s a quote by her:

We will send their women against their men and thereby destroy the strength of their families.

Being masters of deceit and duality, in order to ensure that they don’t meet with violent opposition, Jews support their destructive campaigns like Feminism by establishing anti movements headed by their own people so those affected by its destructiveness and seeking to oppose it end up in a false clique. That is why top anti feminists, like Christina Hoff Summers, planted by the Jew in order to further the destructive agenda or feminism are also Jewish.

It is for similar reasons why the Jews planted and promoted Alex Jones as the most recognized whistle blower. They knew that because not everybody is a helplessly indoctrinated sheeple, after their attacks on the twin towers on 9/11, some people would start asking questions and demand answers, so in order to stir them off the right path, fake whistleblower Alex Jones with his Jewish wife and Jewish co conspirators, sponsored with Zionist money, established their little anti-system system. Once established, the system was heavily promoted by the Jewish media so it appeared as the most prominent whistle blowing entity in the world, leading those who realize that something was not right to it. And thus people seeking answers end up entangled in the false scheme and get totally mislead and deluded, leaving the Zionists with free path to continue on with their destruction.

Do not let the fact that the most recognizable anti feminists are Jewish be a wool over your eyes that prevents you from seeing that Feminism is a Jewish construct. Anti feminists, like Alex Jones are a plant by the Jew who desires to control both sides so effective opposition doesn’t get a chance at catching on.

Feminists trained to use their bodies in order to distance our women from our men are sent to live among us by the Zionists. They are trained and paid to destabilize our societies on the most fundamental level – by destroying our families. And if you consider just how much the ratio of children who grow up without a father increased between the 60′s and today, it’s pretty obvious that their plan is working. It is therefore not surprising that Femen degenerates with their anti family activities are now on the Jewish payroll.

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• gay torture beating pics
• 9/11 conspiracy theory best gore
• Best of Femen
• french soldier killed bestgore
• gore report london cleaver attack video gore

The fact that just about everybody has a camera equipped phone in their pocket, including the Liberal sheeple who have Iphones with which they film vertical videos, helps a great deal in proving what I have been saying this whole time. Women are brainwashed into believing that Feminism is a good thing, that men are not their partners with whom they should coexist by complementing each other, but a threat to their womanhood a dignity. And so with help from pussy whipped lesser men, the Feminism whores abuse their position of a woman to destroy every man they can. Say YES to the uppercut.

CBS13 obtained a cell phone video filmed by a retard with an Iphone which shows a pussy whipped male cop keeping an unarmed man restrained on the ground, while a power tripping feminist female cop beats him senseless with a baton. The victim later died.

The incident happened on the 8300 block of Folsom Boulevard in Sacramento, California. Within the scope of the video, the power tripping female officer struck the victim with her baton 10 times.

Sacramento Police Department issued a statement that a man in his early 40s entered the Metro PCS store and made unintelligible remarks to a female employee (probably a feminist indoctrinated to perceive everything a man does as an attack on her dignity). The female employee called 911 and when the gangsters in uniform arrived, the victim allegedly attempted to barricade himself inside by blocking the front door.

The cops forced their way in and attacked the man, beating him to death. The police press release clarified that pepper spray and multiple baton strikes were used allegedly “to free an officer that was in the suspect’s grasp“. LOL yeah right. Like we haven’t seen enough videos of cops assaulting innocent people and then lying that they were attacked. Cops are notorious liars whose word should never be given any weight in a court of law for that very reason.

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• videosbestfemalegore com
• russian brutality in orphanage
• police beat up bestgore
• men and women beat their children to death
• lee rigby uncensored video
• lee rigby crime scene photo autopsy
• girl kills man best gore
• brutal death of woman image
• bestgore killing police vudeos
• bestgore com police

I don’t know if this video is real or staged, but it’s pretty precious. Sucks to live in the 21st century – everybody has a camera in their pocket. Can’t even feel a girl’s boob on a subway train without some jackass filming you and posting the video on teh interweb.

The video came in handy cause I really wanted to share a Facebook link with you and it’s better to share stuff with some accompanying visual content, even if completely unrelated. I don’t have a Facebook myself – never had and never will, but today a friend sent me a link to a Facebook page that put a smile on my face with sheer brilliancy. Check it out:

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Helen-Keller/254543628830

Props to Best Gore member NuvosOrdo for the video:

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• cruel boob cutting photos
• mutilated nipples pics

Recently, I had my eyes open to what is such an integral part of our culture that it is hardly even noticed – Societal Misandry. Societal Misandry created an Anti Male World that’s been bashed into our minds so tightly, strong anti male bias and preferential treatment of females are not only considered normal and therefore don’t raise any concerns when they occur, any attempt to level the fields is met with strong opposition from both the oppressors and the oppressed. In other words, the indoctrination is so thorough, that even though it’s a privilege (legally and socially) to be a woman, while it downright sucks (legally and socially) to be a man, both men and women would automatically assume it was the other way around, and would in all likelihood assume offensive stances against anyone suggesting otherwise.

A good way to see what I’m talking about it by looking at the way we’re expected to perceive violence against women, versus the society’s expected perception of violence against men. When we see on television images of a man receiving a hard kick in the crotch, everyone is expected to find them funny and everyone, both men and women are expected to laugh. Kicking a man in the crotch has become a staple of comedy. But when we’re shown images of a woman receiving a hard kick in the crotch, everyone is expected to express outrage and everyone, both men and women are expected to call it an assault. Best Gore, of all places, is a good example of how far reaching this Societal Misandry is, as any depiction of violence against women is instantly met with calls for the alleged perpetrator to be lynched, castrated and slowly tortured.

I’m ashamed to admit it, but I was tainted by the societally anticipated anti male discrimination just as badly as everyone else and like everyone else, I failed to see it when it presented itself in all its glory. When Mark was arrested, a female prosecutor made no attempts to hide that she hated men down to the last stinky atom of her body, and that she drew personal gratification from being able to put men down and ruin their lives just because they were men. Yet because constantly putting men down and ruining their lives just because they are men has been such a staple of western societies, it didn’t occur to me in the slightest that it was wrong.

Today, after decades of being berated and put down, men got so cowed, they can’t even fight back anymore. They have no other option but to laugh with everyone else at the images of men being kicked in the crotch and assume themselves that every male, including themselves is an unfeeling future rapist that’s best castrated and lynched at first opportunity. Does it really surprise anyone that suicide rates of males are 4 or more times as high as those of females, when boys are forced to grow up feeling alienated?

How are boys not supposed to feel alienated, apologetic for their existence, and eventually suicidal when even school books are feminized and anti male, placing a lot of focus on the assumption that wars are the result of the innately violent nature of men, while placing virtually no focus on making boys proud for what men have achieved, such as the discovery of mathematics, the printing press, electricity, the steam engine and other important inventions that transformed the world into the modern, physical labor saving, technologically advanced place we inhabit today? Even the legal system that protects women’s safety and women’s rights was invented by men.

This societal misandry is even propagated by the media, especially the television. If you paid attention, you’d notice that sitcoms are replete with images of oafish, bumbling males who in their awkwardness can only ever move forward with the assistance of smart, smug females. You’d also notice how crime shows depict men as evil murderers and rapists, how feminized male stars relentlessly pursue them and when they get them, they slam these evil rapists against a wall and bark: “you low life scumbag!” But when the occasional episode revolves around a female suspect, she’s never slammed against a wall and called a low life scumbag cause in her case, there surely must have been a good reason for murdering the child.

It is the same with TV commercials. Typically. as the scene opens, some buffoon of a man is struggling to have a clue as to what something is all about. Before long, an all-knowing woman, rolling her eyes and shaking her head in pity, saves the day by helping the stupid buffoon of a man not utterly ruin everything with the use of the product advertised. Sometimes, not to be too repetitive, a version of a TV commercial in which it is the children who are all-wise that help the buffoon of a man figure things out as they step in with the product. And of course, all of us, both men and women are expected to laugh: “Hahaha, look at that stupid guy. What an idiot!”

I made this post to once and for all counter the disillusion that women are disadvantaged in life because of male privilege and patriarchal oppression. I was once the victim of this disillusion myself, so I know all too well how saturated it is, and suspect many Best Gore readers were tricked by societal misandry to embrace the anti male world too.

Note that instead of making this article a collection of my own thoughts, I built it almost exclusively on references from what should be for the most part considered “reliable sources”. All claims that follow are based on scientific studies and researches by university professors and are therefore verifiable facts, not opinions.

Bodily Integrity

In many countries, including Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom and United States, a woman has legal protection of her bodily integrity (her body, her choice)[73], but a man does not (his body, not his choice).[72]

What that means is that Female Genital Mutilation is illegal, while Male Genital Mutilation is not only legal, it’s often not even regulated so it can be performed by anyone (pedophile Rabbi is not a schooled and trained surgeon). Frequently, genital mutilation of men is performed before the victim is old enough to make consenting choices of his own.[71]

In some countries, such as the Philippines, boys are under societal pressure to undergo genital mutilation, and in Indonesia, the act of genital mutilation of boys is exaggerated by public humiliation.

In the Netherlands, girls have the right to bodily integrity and mutilating their genitals is illegal. Boys do not have this right and mutilating their genitals is not only legal, but covered by certain health insurances.[36]

Rape

You Have Been Indoctrinated by Societal Misandry If You Instantly Thought of Mocking a Man Who Dare Open Up About Having Been a Victim of Rape

In many countries, the definition of rape does not include men being raped by women.[1] In the UK, if a man uses his penis to penetrate a woman without her consent, it is rape – a crime punishable by up to a life in prison. However if a woman uses a man’s penis to penetrate herself without his consent, it’s not rape, it’s merely “causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent” – a crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison. In other words, a woman can’t legally “rape” a man. In the anti-male world, for women there are “lesser” crimes.[2]

On Wikipedia, under Laws Regarding Rape, I found this:[3]

There are no national standards for defining and reporting male-on-male, female-on-female or female-on-male offenses, so such crimes are generally not included in rape statistics unless these statistics are compiled using information from states which count them as rape.

In Ireland, teenage boys can be prosecuted for underage sex while teen girls are exempt.[41]

In Israel, women cannot be charged with rape, only men can.[42] It is the same in India.[43]

Anti Male Bias in Dictionaries

Previous Definition of Word Rapist by Oxford Dictionaries

When Mark was first charged, Oxford Dictionary’s definition of “Rapist” was “a man who commits rape“. After countless complaints, the definition was amended into “a person, typically a man, who commits rape“. The anti men sexism and anti men gender based discrimination is embedded so strongly in our societies, not even dictionaries try to hide it.

Oxford Dictionaries Amended the Definition of Rapist to This Joke

By the same logic, the definition of “Terrorist” should be “a person, typically a Jew, who commits acts of terrorism“. Except that that’s not a good example because women are perpetrators of rape equally often as men, but terrorism has been dominated by the Jews since they invented it. And I’m not merely talking about the invention of modern terrorism which started with Jews bombing King David Hotel, the site for the British Military Command in Palestine back in 1946, killing dozens of innocent people and blaming it on Muslims, which is when word “terrorism” was first used. I’m also talking about the earliest known use of acts which would be known as terrorism today – Sicarii (which translates as dagger-men) as they were known by the Romans were the Zealots of Judea who carried on underground campaigns of assassination of Roman forces, as well as anyone else they felt had collaborated with the Romans.

I Took the Liberty of Fixing the Oxford Dictionaries Definition of Terrorist Following the Same Guidelines They Use to Define Rapist

Rape Policies on College Campuses

On April 4, 2011 (it became known as the April 4th Dear Colleague Letter), the US federal Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) sent a letter to colleges and universities throughout the United States that receive federal funding, mandating policy changes in the way schools address matters of sexual harassment and sexual assault on campus.[4]

The letter reduces the standard of proof required to convict a male student of rape to “preponderance of evidence” and “strongly discourages” colleges from giving male students the right to question their rape accuser. The directive also requires all universities to allow alleged rape victims to appeal the results of college disciplinary hearings, subjecting the accused to “double jeopardy” which is illegal in US courts.[5]

Fake Rape Statistics

Men Don’t Rape People, Rapists Rape People

The 1994 study by Eugene J. Kanin, Ph.D., published in the Archives Of Sexual Behavior, Volume 23, No 1, conducted in a small metropolitan community in the US found that 41% of rape accusations filed by women were false. A follow up study, found 50% of rape allegations in college to be false. 53% of the women admitted they filed the false claim as an alibi.[6][7]

The findings, which were published by the forensic experts (unbiased researchers who are neither pro feminist, nor anything else) concluded with:

the research on accusations of rape, sexual harassment, incest, and child sexual abuse indicates that false accusations have become a serious problem. The motivations involved in making a false report are widely varied and include confusion, outside influence from therapists and others, habitual lying, advantages in custody disputes, financial gain, and the political ideology of radical feminism.

What Fake Rape Victim Says vs What Probably Really Happened

According to a US Air force study, 60% of rapes allegations are false. A full 27% of the allegations were confirmed to be false by the woman admitting to making them up.[8] It however also must be said that the military is pushing rape cases harder to appear like they are being “fair” to women.

A rape prosecutor from Colorado by the name of Craig Silverman said:[9]

During my time as a prosecutor who made case filing decisions, I was amazed to see all the false rape allegations that were made to the Denver Police Department. It was remarkable and surprising to me. You would have to see it to believe it. Any honest veteran sex assault investigator will tell you that rape is one of the most falsely reported crimes that there is. A command officer in the Denver police sex assaults unit recently told me he placed the false rape numbers at approximately 45 percent.

Regret Sex Doesn’t Always Equal Rape Sex

The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey conducted by the US National Center for Injury Prevention and Control of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that women make up 40% of all rapists and men are 50% of all victims outside of prison.[13]

As the case of Duke Lacrosse Players from Durham, North Carolina suggests, men who are falsely accused of rape can have their names smeared and their lives ruined, while their accuser is protected and is likely to face no punishment, or at most a light one.[47]

However these figures do not take into account social stigmas that force men into suppressing their victimization for fear of being viewed as effeminate, weak or incompetent, and cultural tolerance and glorification of women who falsely accuse men of rape.[58]

In India, a senior woman lawyer confirmed that females making false allegations of rape is at epidemic levels.[66]

This one is just… Serial false rape claimant who was eventually jailed after destroying 11 lives.[68]

Violence Against Victims of False Rape Accusations

This Is Gender Equality

I already said in the introduction to this article that even the readers of BestGore, both men and women are guilty of strong anti male bias. It reflects in the way they react to any news of alleged violence against women, but you hardly ever see anything comparable when men are subjected to unspeakable atrocities, which happens far more frequently and with far greater ferocity.

Good example if the story of a man who was falsely accused of rape and was lynched to death for it. He was later found to be innocent. Here’s another alleged rapist was beheaded, stabbed and mutilated.

A few example not on Best Gore:

• Teenage boy named Cory Headen from Courtenay, British Columbia, Canada was beaten to death with a baseball bat after two girls falsely accused him of rape.[10]
• Woman falsely accused a man of raping her in order to sue for a $1.5 million settlement. Brian Banks spent 5 years in prison. The woman then casually confessed that the accusation was fake and said she wanted “bygones to be bygones” but did not want to have to pay back the money. Where are calls to have this bitch castrated and tortured slowly?[11]
• Town of Davis, California goes ape shit after a woman cries rape, claiming that she was raped by teenage skater boys. Cops go overboard questioning dozens of boys, feminists and their ilk hold rallies for the “victim”. Male hating graffiti is spread across town, including such perks as “Dead Boys Don’t Rape” and “Curfew for All Men”. The “victim” admits the allegation was fake, the woman is not charged but feminists and their ilk don’t accept the possibility it could be fake.[12]

Sentencing Disparity

Research by David B. Mustard, University of Georgia concluded that women receive lighter sentences and a higher chance of acquittal, simply for being women. Average sentence for same crime under similar circumstances (armed robbery):[14]

• Male: 51.52 months
• Female: 18.51 months

Woman Lies About Father Raping Her, He Spends 9 Years in Jail, Prosecutor Refuses to Charge Women for Fear It Would Discourage Other Fake Rape Victims

A Queens Family Court Judge John Hunt analyzed the cases of eight teenagers who had come before him – four boys and four girls – and found that probation routinely recommended tougher treatment for boys, doing all they could to spare all but the most violent girls from prison time.[15]

In Canada, if a man kills a child, it’s considered murder, punishable by up to a life in prison with no parole for 10 to 25 years. But if a woman kills her children, she has the rights to be charged with Infanticide, which carries a maximum sentence of 5 years and no minimum sentence. Men do not have that right.[44]

Law Professor Sonja Starr from Michigan University found in her 2012 study of federal criminal cases that men receive on average 63% longer sentences than women do, and women are twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted all together.[45]

The following is based on 1990 – 2000 US census:[46]

• For every 100 girls ages 15 to 17 in correctional facilities there are 837 boys behind bars.
• For every 100 women ages 18 to 21 in correctional facilities there are 1430 men behind bars.
• For every 100 women ages 22 to 24 in correctional facilities there are 1448 men in correctional facilities.

Sentencing Disparity in Anti Male World

In a recent case from Canada, a 26 year old woman who gave oral sex to a 5 year old girl was found to NOT be a pedophile. Imagine if it was a man giving oral sex to a 5 year old! Talk about sentencing disparity.[67]

Another recent case of serious double standard from Houston, Texas – woman teacher, pedophile and sexual predator seduces a 16 year old boy and sexually violates him. She’s sentenced to no jail time, only a $5,000 fine and a probation. No word on whether she will also end up registered as a sex offender, which likely means that she probably won’t as it would have been mentioned in the article. Imagine if roles were reversed, if a male teacher seduced and sexually violated a 16 year girl. We wouldn’t hear the end of it from the ranks of feminazis, and the guy would be sentenced to 20+ years in prison and spend the rest of his life knocking on people’s doors to tell them that he was a pedo and a sexual deviant. Not to mention the little fact that prosecutors agreed to the plea deal because Nikki Scherwitz agreed to send apologies to the mother and the district, but not to the victim![69]

Domestic Violence

End Violence Against Everyone

Basic domestic violence resolution policy in just about every western country is “arrest the male“. Yet women are known to be more or equally physically aggressive with their spouses/partner than men in their relationships.

A reference examining assaults by women on their spouses or male partners – an annotated bibliography by Martin S. Fiebert from the Department of Psychology, California State University, Long Beach found that women are perpetrators of physical and emotional abuse as or more often, and are as or more aggressive with their partners as men.[16]

Domestic violence study directed by John Hamel, the Editor-in-Chief of Partner Abuse, a Springer Publishing Company – a three-year research project, conducted by 42 scholars at 20 universities and research centers that included information on 17 areas of domestic violence research concluded that “the victim is not always the one hit, but sometimes the one arrested.“[17]

The study also found that men are not only disproportionately arrested in domestic violence cases, but sometimes arrested for arbitrary reasons, citing, for example, that police often arrest the bigger and stronger party in cases where the perpetrator is unclear.

Even though study after study proves that women are as frequent or more common instigators of domestic violence as men, the “arrest the male no matter what” resolution policy automatically presumes the innocence of the woman and guilt of the man regardless of who the aggressor is.

International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, Vol 5 Issue 1, January – June 2010 published a study on male victims of intimate partner violence in the United States in which it quoted a study by George and Yarwood who found that police have threatened 47% of male victims of intimate partner violence with arrest, ignored 35% of male victims and 21% were actually arrested instead of the female perpetrators.[18]

Study titled “Disabusing the Definition of Domestic Abuse: How Women Batter Men and the Role of the Feminist State” by Linda Kelly, Professor of Law at Indiana University School of Law, found that when abused men call the police to report domestic violence committed against them by their female partner, they are three times more likely to be arrested than their spouse that is abusing them.[19]

Pro Footballer Warren Moon was arrested after he was assaulted by his wife who threw a candlestick at this head and kneed him in the groin. To prevent further assault, Moon restrained his wife but as soon as police arrived, they arrested him and charged him with domestic violence. His wife later confessed that she was being unduly violent while he did not retaliate in any way which lead to his acquittal, but as was the case with feminists from Davis, California who simply would not accept the possibility that a woman falsely accused a man of rape (I mentioned the case earlier, see reference [12]), in this case women’s group again insisted that Moon be charged. In Anti Male world dominated by Societal Misandry, a man is expected to be held responsible for woman’s criminal deeds.[22]

A University of Florida study found women are more likely to “stalk, attack and abuse” their partners than men.[33]

A 2007 Center for Disease Control study found that almost a quarter (24%) of relationships had violence, about half (49.7%) was reciprocal. In non-reciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70 percent of the cases.[34]

Restraining Orders

As if being subjected to domestic violence by their female partner was not bad enough for men, to make matters even worse, in the anti male society, women can easily file a restraining order, and just because they are women, judges don’t even verify allegations, they just issue the order.

How easy is it for women to get a restraining order? In 2005, Santa Fe District Judge Daniel Sanchez issued a temporary restraining order to “protect” Colleen Nester who alleged that what CBS talk show host David Letterman said on his show were in fact coded messages spoken with an intent to harass her and express his desire to marry her. When asked why he had issues the restraining order on such a ridiculous allegation, Judge Sanchez replied that Ms. Nestler had filled out the restraining order request correctly.[24]

In a 2010 study on partner abuse titled “A Closer Look at Men Who Sustain Intimate Terrorism by Women“, Professor Denise A. Hines PhD of Clark University and Emily M. Douglas PhD of Bridgewater State College found that of 302 men who experienced domestic violence by their wives, 38.7% reported that she filed a restraining order against him under false pretenses.[25]

Domestic Violence Hotlines and Shelters

Anti Male Bias by Government

Research by the US based National Parents Organization found that 64% of men who made distress calls to tax dollars funded domestic violence shelters were told that the shelter was only helping women. Most reported to have been laughed at and hung up on, or told that women don’t commit domestic violence therefore it must have been the caller’s fault.[20]

According to the research by Mankind Initiative, in the UK there are only 13 organizations that offer refuge or safe house provision for male victims of domestic violence with a total of 78 bed, of which 33 beds are dedicated to male victims only (the rest being for victims of either gender), and of these 33 dedicated beds, 18 are for gay males only. In comparison, in the UK there are over 260 organizations with around 4,000 beds dedicated to female victims of domestic violence.[21]

In other words, in the anti-male world, at least 50% of domestic violence victims are men, but there are at least 100x as many shelter spaces available for women cause men need to just deal with it and stop whining that they are being abused. Afterall, if they sought help, they would be just laughed at and blamed for being perpetrators themselves.

Child Custody

According to the US census on Custodial Mothers and Fathers, women receive custody of the children in about 84% of custody cases.[23]

Research on Child Maltreatment by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families found that 81.2% of children who were maltreated, were maltreated by a parent (the remaining 18.8% were maltreated by people in nonparental relationship with them, such as daycare stuff, foster parents, neighbors, legal guardians, relatives, etc.). Of children maltreated by a parent, 38.3% were maltreated by a mother, 6.0% by a mother and other person, 18.1% by a father, 0.9 by a father and other person, and 17.9% by both a mother and a father.[70]

We however need to take into account custodial mothers and fathers disparity as outlined by the census listed above. According to the U.S. Population Reference Bureau Data Brief, 71% of children are raised in a nuclear family, 29% are raised in single-parent families. If women receive custody in 84% of cases, we can presume that 84% of children that grow up in single-parent families are mother-led. Thus, of 29% of single parent families, 24.36% are mother-lead, and 4.64% are father lead. For the benefit of women, let’s round these figures to 24% mother-lead and 5% father-lead.

Thus, the following can be deduced:

• 76% of children grow up with a father present, while 95% of children grow up with a mother present.
• That means that for each 100 children who grow up with a father present, 125 grow up with a mother present
• Of all maltreated children, 62.2% are maltreated by a mother (sum up of 38.3% maltreated by a mother, 6.0% by a mother and other person, and 17.9% by both a mother and a father) and 36.9% are maltreated by a father (sum up of 18.1% by a father, 0.9 by a father and other person, and 17.9% by both a mother and a father)
• That means that for each 100 children maltreated by a father, there are 168 maltreated by a mother
• Thus, taking into account custodial disparity, mothers are 1.34 times more likely to maltreat their children than fathers.

It is truly alarming that women are granted custody of the children after a split 5 times more often than men, yet they are 1.34 times more likely to be perpetrators of maltreatment then men. In other words, maltreatment of children would be reduced by 25.4% if instead of to the mothers, custody of children was awarded to the fathers.

Considering that according to the Health and Human Services, 0.78 million children were maltreated between 2004 and 2008, by giving custody of the children to the fathers instead of to the mothers, 198,120 children could have been spared maltreatment!

Scholarship Discrimination

A first-of-a-kind study of NCAA participation and scholarship data conducted by the College Sports Council (CSC) found that female students are accorded far more opportunities than male students to compete and earn scholarships. Girls were awarded scholarships almost twice as often as boys – for every 200 boys, 320 girls got scholarship.[26][27]

Hate Crimes Discrimination

Pursuant to the 1964 Civil Rights legislation, the US Department of Justice will not investigate cases of bullying if the victim is a white male.[28]

On some airlines, such as Air New Zealand, men are banned from sitting next to kids on airplanes, simply because they are men and societal anti-male bias dictates that every man is a presumed rapist. British Airways have recently changed this discriminatory policy.[54]

Homicides

As a reality news website, there is no other place where Woman Privilege can be observed more clearly than on Best Gore. One just needs to click on “All The Gore” button in top menu and go from page to page to see how utterly rare it is for a woman to become a victim of violence. And not only is violence against women rarer than violence against men, the severity of violence is also beyond compare.

The homicide trends study by the US Bureau of Justice Statistics found that the victimization rate for males was 3 times higher than the rate for females.[29]

Workplace Deaths

Again, one needs only to look around Best Gore to see that men die or get injured performing their work duties more often than women.

Majority of employees who do dangerous jobs are men. First world governments put significant effort to encourage women to enter fields traditionally made up of men, but no encouragement is made to take on the burden of doing dangerous work.

Last summer 19 firefighters died in Arizona. All of them were men. Not surprisingly, feminist blogosphere did not explode with calls of gender equality.[74]

Boys are brainwashed from an early age that to prove that they are masculine, they have to take on dangerous jobs. If you need an example, consider and army recruitment ad.

According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, men account for 92% of all fatal work injuries.[30]

Congressional Research Service on American War and Military Operations Casualties provided the following statistics on deaths of military servicemen:[31]

• Operation Enduring Freedom (from October 7, 2001 through February 6, 2010): Total deaths 973, of which 953 were male. Total wounded in action 4,949 of which 4,899 were male.
• Operation Iraqi Freedom (from March 19, 2003 through February 6, 2010): Total deaths 4,365 of which 4,261 were male. Total wounded in action (since May 1, 2003) 31,103, of which 30,495 were male.

Suicides

Suicides are perhaps the best indicator of how much it sucks to be a man and what privilege it is to be a woman. When one is pushed to go through with suicide, to make the ultimate sacrifice (as opposed to just making a scene in order to win the drama queen of the day award – calls for attention with fake suicide attempts are, as preponderance of becoming a fake rape victim, also a domain of women) and to take their own life, the pressure on them must have been unbearable.

For every 100 females ages 15 to 19 that commit suicide, 549 males in the same range commit suicide. For every 100 females ages 20 to 24 that commit suicide 624 males of the same age commit suicide.[48]

One confusing factor in all this could be the finding that women attempt suicide more often than men. This has mostly to do with the fact that women often attempt suicide not because they mean to kill themselves, but to draw attention to themselves. Whereas most men who attempt suicide do it because nobody pays attention to their problems.

There are many mechanisms, including governmental institutions and non governmental organizations dedicated exclusively to help women to cope with stressful situations. But hardly any or none at all dedicated to men. With few outlets for men to cope, and with pressure on them being higher than on women, things can build up and go past the breaking point quickly. Add to it the societal pressure on men to cope or be called a girl, a sissy or a deadbeat and it’s easy to see why men actually go through with suicides, as opposed to using them as a call for help.

Homelessness

6 in 7 Homeless Is a Man, But Societal Misandry Commands to Only Worry About Women

The 2009 Annual Homeless Assessment Report by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development found that 63.7% of homeless in the USA are men.[32]

Affirmative Action

In many countries, affirmative action in favor of women is allowed while affirmative action in favor of men is illegal.[35]

In Canada, an employer in a male dominated field is allowed to discriminate against men and hire women preferentially, whereas an employer in a female dominated field isn’t allowed to hire men preferentially. While affirmative action pretends to be a noble cause, what it does is give women a net advantage in the workplace as a whole and discriminates against men in the workplace as a whole.

Children

Sexist Billboard Fixed – Teach Your Son How to Respect Everyone

In the Netherlands, women have the right to give up an unwanted child for adoption immediately after birth, thereby stripping themselves of all financial responsibility for the child. Men do not have this right.[36][38]

In the US, a woman can name any man she chooses as the father. The man gets a letter in the mail, if he does not prove he isn’t the biological father within 30 days (problems with postal service are not an excuse) he is now the father, cannot contest it and must pay.[49]

As per Hermesmann v. Seyer, a woman is entitled to sue the father of her child for child support even if conception occurred as a result of a criminal act, like statutory rape, committed by the woman.[55]

Conscription

In some countries, military service is mandatory for men. In many others, men are required to register for selective service.

In the USA, most male U.S. citizens and male immigrant non-citizens between the ages of 18 and 25 are subjects to the Selective Service System which makes them potential subjects to military conscription.[39]

In the Netherlands, men between the ages of 17 and 45 are subjects to the draft.[40]

Government Spending Disparity

The following figures are from British Columbia, Canada but expect similar government spending disparity in most western societies:

• In 2008/2009 the province dedicated $561,360 on grants toward men’s resources and $98,983,236 toward women’s resources.[50]
• In 2009/2010 BC government spent $1,516,460 on grants toward men’s resources and $57,562,373 toward women’s resources.[51]
• In 2010/2011 BC government spent $3,740,800 on grants toward men’s resources and $48,331,443 toward women’s resources.[52]

Female-owned businesses get free government money for no reason other than because they are run by a woman (i.e. if you took two businesses of equal niche, size, income and other factors, with the only difference being that one is run by a woman and the other by man, it’s that one difference that will open doors for the one run by a woman to free government money).[53]

Health Research Disparity

Obamacare contains 148 special provisions and programs for women but none for men, even though health and life expectancy outlooks for men are much grimmer than for women. The US federal healthcare spending is already 65% on women.[56]

Men die on average 7 years earlier than women. Before the age of 65 men are three times as likely to suffer heart disease and twice as likely to die from lung cancer than women.

An entire branch of the UN is dedicated to women issues, but nothing for men.[56]

There are branches of federal governments dedicated to women’s health issues, but none for men.[57][59]

Alleged Wage Gap

Feminazis like to use the allegation that women are paid less than men as basis for their attacks on men. A 2009 study funded by the US Department of Labor titled “An Analysis of the Reasons for the Disparity in Wages Between Men and Women” found that the alleged pay gap only exists because it’s merely a snapshot of average yearly full-time incomes that does not account for overtime (about 90% male), type of work performed, or other voluntary, non-discriminatory factors. In conclusion, the Department of Labor proved that the alleged the pay gap is caused by choices, not discrimination.[60]

Here’s also a video with Carrie Lukas, Independent Women’s Forum Executive Director who clarified the alleged wage gap that exists between men and women. Ms. Lukas argued that while labor surveys show women earn 77% of what men earn for equal work, in reality women earn, on average, as much or even more than men.[61]

Here’s another well presented report on why alleged gender pay gap is now what activists claim.[62]

Another well presented report by a woman who argues that equal pay statistics don’t like with like.[63]

Feminism Killed Chivalry

Feminism Double Standard

I have just read an article by a woman who wondered why a man would not offer to help with her heavy bag on an airplane. I would consider it a privilege to punch this bitch in the face.[65]

Welcome to equality! This is what constant battering of men achieved. The reporter displays blatant misandry and insults men by likening them to peacocks, but in the same breath thinks she deserves special privileges just because she’s a woman. What a fantastic display of feminist mentality – to be disrespectful, entitled, conceited, and detached from reality all at once.

Could a man in his mid 50′s realistically help a younger, attractive woman without being accused of reinforcing his sexist gender role by assuming that the woman couldn’t take care of herself, or more realistically, be assumed a creep and a rapist looking to get close to his victim? I wouldn’t help any woman either. I would probably not even look at her since mere eye contact may constitute harassment in the eyes of the feminist who seeks to destroy every man for being a man, and since this type of behavior is supported by the judiciary.

Chivalry is dead, and rightly so. The reason? Chivalry used be a two way street and included a healthy respect for the men who displayed it.

But man still have it in them. They just can’t afford to risk being cavalier for a realistic threat of having their life ruined by a rape faker. For a man, it’s legally and socially sounder to just treat a woman like another middle aged man.

Real Women Don’t Need Feminism

As for Ms. Katarina Kroslakova, author of the article – have you considered asking for help? I doubt it cause having troubles lifting your bag was not really your problem, as cabin crew would gladly help you with it if they saw you couldn’t do it yourself. Your problem clearly was your deluded sense of entitlement to privilege for being a woman. Your demand that men help you without hitting on you suggests that you have a long history of considering men beneath you and take great joy in rejecting them.

Mother Nature Knows Men Have It Harder

On a societal level, facts can be misrepresented in favor of those with bigger mouth (in this case “feminists”), so if you grew up in an anti male society, you have likely been brainwashed to believe that women had it harder than men. Wherever humans with their shortcomings and frailty are involved, duplicity is to be expected. One entity that is above human frailty and as such knows better, is Mother Nature.

Despite what feminazis and their ilk of pussy whipped men would have us believe, Mother Nature knows that men have upon their shoulders burdens much harder to carry than women and as such will perish at a greater rate, so to compensate for it, she made it so more men are born then women. Nowadays, according to the CIA factbook, current world wide sex ratio at birth is 107 boys to 100 girls.[75]

This is Mother Nature telling us that men have it harder than women so more of them need to be born to make up for the size of the burdens they have to carry throughout their lives.

Feminism

To gain an understanding that we live in an anti male world is not being anti-woman. It’s merely a call for social and legal equality between genders. Not total equality, as that is a ridiculous concept that’s impossible to institute. I’m talking about giving men rights that are denied to them, including human rights such as the right to bodily integrity or the right to access to opportunity whereby men currently have no right to be equal in outcome.

Feminism, which is a destructive ideology that’s not only anti boy and anti man, but also anti girl and anti woman, should face societal and legal condemnation at minimum equal to terrorism, as its negative effects on the innocent are far more damaging and pervasive.

Feminists argue against things like female genital mutilation in third world countries, but are okay with male genital mutilation in first world countries. Not to mention that feminists are completely blind to higher suicide rates among men, higher incarceration rates, higher victims of violence and work accidents rates, the draft, visitation rights for fathers, court rulings against fathers, alimony, perception of kind men as pedophiles, demonization and criminalization of male sexuality, pulling a “victim blaming” card if someone doesn’t automatically side with fake rape victim just because she’s a women, et cetera.

We need to stop treating men like second class citizens who are beneath women – both culturally and legally.

Conclusion

Societal Misandry in most of what’s known as first world is heavily anti male biased. Most countries have various commissions on the status of women funded by taxpayer dollars, but nothing for men. Many countries provide tax benefits for businesses that are “woman-owned” and have contracts guaranteed to women-owned businesses, but not for men-owned business.

Most countries have a violence against women act, and/or Department of Justice Office on Violence Against Women, but nothing comparable for men, yet men are twice as likely to be the victims of a violent attack.

Women are granted almost absolute rights to their own born children, yet men only get rights to their own children when granted by the courts or by the legal precedent of marriage to the mother.

Women live on average 7 years longer, yet countries don’t have departments of men’s health, only departments of women’s health.

Among women’s rights that men don’t have granted by legal precedent are:

• The right to abortion
• The right to abandon her child without her partner’s consent.
• The right to place her child up for adoption without or against the father’s consent
• The right to lower jail sentences for the same crime, more likely to receive probation than incarceration and also shorter periods of incarceration.
• The right “not to be offended” in the workplace.
• The right to have a man evicted from his home because she says she’s “afraid” of him.
• The right to make false allegations of rape, domestic violence or child abuse with relative impunity.
• The right to keep custody of children after divorce unless proven to be an unfit parent.
• The right to have a man arrested on only her word, with no supporting evidence, upon an allegation of rape.
• The right to women-only clubs, gyms or accommodations.
• The right to use depression, PMS, or “being controlled by a man” as a legal defense and having way more of a chance of it.
• The right to a standard of “self defense” that does not include an immediate threat.

Responsibilities that men have which women do not by law:

• Selective service (The Draft).
• A requirement to list themselves on a putative father listing to have even the thinnest rights to their children.
• A requirement to support their wives (husbands can be charged with abandonment, wives cannot.)

Responsibilities that men have which women do not by legal precedent:

• The responsibility to financially support their children (custodial mothers are not slapped with an “earn this much or go to jail” order. Plus mothers are rarely ordered to support their children who are in the custody of the father.)
• The responsibility to accept being forced into parenthood against their will.
• The responsibility to get over their past as men cannot use prior abuse as a legal defense, but women can.

Furthermore:

• Men do not have the right to be recognized as victims of rape when forced into non consensual intercourse, nor do they have the right to have those who have perpetuated these acts against them to be charged as rapists.
• Men do not have the right to be recognized as victims of domestic violence and afforded the protections that women are. Men do not have the right to not be arrested for reporting being victim of domestic violence (as per mandatory arrest and primary aggressor laws).
• Men receive on average a 63% percent harsher sentence for identical convictions as a woman, an even larger gap than the racial discrimination in court.
• Men do not have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, especially in crimes of sexual nature, in which they must often prove their innocence. This right has been effectively dismantled in the recent “Dear College” letter. This mandate is not applied generally to women.
• When accused of sexual crimes on a college campus, men do not have the right to be defended by an attorney. Men do not have the right to have their accusation tried and investigated by law enforcement professionals and scents vs given by judges.
• US women use 20% more healthcare dollars over a lifetime but pay the same premiums.
• US women use 50% more social security and survivor’s benefits but pay significantly less tax. In some countries women even get to draw benefits earlier.

Protect Yourself

Woman Sells Positive Pregnancy Tests on Craigslist to Help Unjust Women Take Advantage of Men in Anti male Society

I would like to propose to foster the equal valuing of men and women socially as well as their equal treatment under the law. However given the anti men toxicity of current cultural environment, I don’t see it as a feasible possibility. Leastways not in any foreseeable future. So I’ll propose a tip for men on how to protect themselves from societal misandry.

Since the topic of self protection could get rather lengthy, and this post is already a monster, I’ll narrow it down to just one tip – Don’t Date!

Just don’t date. Ever. No ifs, buts or whats. If you need to bust your nut, either masturbate, or get a whore.

As a man in an anti male world, you will automatically put yourself at a disadvantage if you willfully participate in a dating game. If she won’t fuck you without you buying her something, pass on her right there, right then and save the money you would have spent while still facing the risk of sexual rejection, for an actual prostitute with whom you know what you get, when and for how much.

With dating, you don’t know what you get, you don’t even know if you get anything at all, and at the end of the day, it will always cost you more. It will cost you not only in money, but also in time you will never get back, and you will have to play a tool to her with courtship and other anti male societal norms.

The world is already in their favor, not yours. Don’t make it worse for yourself by playing their game.

References

[1] http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/1 – A person (A) commits an offence if (a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b)B does not consent to the penetration, and (c)A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
[2] http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/4
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_regarding_rape
[4] http://www.thefire.org/frequently-asked-questions-ocrs-april-4-dear-colleague-guidance-letter/
[5] http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903596904576516232905230642.html
[6] http://falserapearchives.blogspot.com/2009/06/archives-of-sexual-behavior-feb-1994.html
[7] https://archive.org/details/FalseRapeAllegations
[8] http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume6/j6_2_4.htm
[9] http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=573
[10] http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/courtenay-man-gets-7-years-for-vigilante-killing-1.859939
[11] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/08/brian-banks-accuser-caugh_n_1581605.html
[12] http://articles.latimes.com/1991-08-20/news/mn-1241_1_davis-enterprise
[13] http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf
[14] http://www.terry.uga.edu/~mustard/sentencing.pdf
[15] https://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/judged-bashes-probation-department-gender-bias-favor-leniency-girls-article-1.473763
[16] http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm
[17] http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/5/prweb10741752.htm?PID=4003003
[18] http://www.sascv.org/ijcjs/pdfs/carolettaijcjs2010vol5iss1.pdf
[19] http://www.law.fsu.edu/Journals/lawreview/downloads/304/kelly.pdf
[20] https://nationalparentsorganization.org/06/researcher-what-happens-when-abused-men-call-domestic-violence-hotlines-and-shelters/
[21] http://www.mankind.org.uk/pdfs/21%20Key%20Facts_August%202013.pdf
[22] http://www.nytimes.com/1996/02/23/sports/pro-football-jury-rapidly-acquits-moon-of-spousal-abuse-charges.html
[23] https://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/p60-225.pdf
[24] http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1643
[25] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2913504/
[26] http://collegesportscouncil.org/newsroom/display_releases.cfm?id=28
[27] http://www.collegesportscouncil.org/20090715.pdf
[28] http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2011/mar/18/doj-white-male-bullying-victims-tough-luck/
[29] http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2221
[30] http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfch0009.pdf
[31] http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf
[32] http://www.societyhealth.vcu.edu/files/HO-HAR2009.pdf#Exhibit3-4
[33] http://news.ufl.edu/2006/07/13/women-attackers/
[34] http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020
[35] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action
[36] http://www.erishulp.nl/index.php?paginaID=12
[37] http://mens-en-samenleving.infonu.nl/sociaal-cultureel/50134-vrouwenbesnijdenis-in-nederland.html
[38] http://www.wetboek-online.nl/wet/BW1/204.html
[39] http://www.sss.gov/
[40] http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/krijgsmacht/dienstplicht
[41] http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/boy-facing-sex-trial-as-court-upholds-romeo-and-juliet-law-26824861.html
[42] http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Womens-groups-Cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape
[43] http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Only-men-can-be-booked-for-rape/Article1-1021702.aspx
[44] http://davidgbayliss.com/murder-manslaughter-infanticide-culpable-homicide-canadian-law/
[45] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2144002
[46] https://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/briefs/phc-t26/index.html
[47] http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-01/duke-lacrosse-players-suit-over-false-rape-claim-may-proceed-judge-says.html
[48] http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/LCWK1_2002.pdf
[49] http://reason.com/archives/2004/02/01/injustice-by-default
[50] http://www.gaming.gov.bc.ca/reports/docs/rpt-grant-historical-fy-2007-08-to-2012-13.xls?
[51] http://www.gaming.gov.bc.ca/reports/docs/fin-rpt-core-grants-2009-10.pdf?
[52] http://www.gaming.gov.bc.ca/reports/docs/fin-rpt-core-grants-2009-10.pdf?
[53] http://reason.com/archives/2004/07/01/confessions-of-a-woman-owned-b
[54] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travelnews/7957982/British-Airways-changes-discriminatory-seating-policy-for-men.html
[55] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer
[56] http://www.unwomen.org/
[57] http://www.womenshealth.gov/
[58] http://www.mediaradar.org/research_on_false_rape_allegations.php
[59] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_Commission_on_the_Status_of_Women
[60] http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf
[61] http://www.c-span.org/video/?299089-4/wage-gap-men-women
[62] http://www.examiner.com/article/gender-pay-gap-is-not-what-activists-claim
[63] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/vickiwoods/7957186/Sorry-ladies-Im-not-worried-about-wage-gaps.html
[64] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/vickiwoods/7957186/Sorry-ladies-Im-not-worried-about-wage-gaps.html
[65] http://www.theage.com.au/executive-style/culture/quit-hitting-on-me-and-help-me-out-20140213-32jur.html
[66] http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Tougher-rape-law-leading-to-increase-in-false-cases/articleshow/30807940.cms
[67] http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/canada/archives/2014/02/20140221-141943.html
[68] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9894588/Compulsive-liar-jailed-after-11-false-rape-claims-in-decade.html
[69] http://www.khou.com/news/cnn/Teacher-gets-probation-for-having-sex-with-student–246607861.html
[70] http://archive.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm08/cm08.pdf
[71] http://www.humanrightseurope.org/2013/10/jagalnd-male-circumcision-does-not-violate-human-rights/
[72] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision_and_law
[73] https://www.unfpa.org/gender/practices2.htm#21
[74] http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/01/us/arizona-firefighter-deaths/
[75] https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2018.html
[76] http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-men-the-weaker-sex/

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• woman rape dead nude body
• rape dead body video
• raped lady dead pics
• girl gets raped to death clip
• pics of teens raped
• rape girl nude image
• nude rape of young girls
• dead bitch raped
• young teen vagina rape
• boys sex with girl death body video

Foreword by Acneska:

The above is a page from a court document which contains the narrative of a female prosecutor provided at Mark Marek’s first court hearing. If it wasn’t for Mark who was the only one to point out the obvious, none of us would have noticed how anti male this prosecutor’s speech was. It was at this moment when I realized that we truly do live in an anti male world and societal misandry is so deeply embedded in our minds, we tend to perceive it as nothing out of the ordinary.

When it comes to actual crimes whereby there is a victim who suffered harm or loss, the investigators try to find the person who committed the crime, while the prosecutors try to impose justice upon the criminal for causing harm or loss. But because Mark Marek has never caused any harm or loss to anyone, there has never been any victim to his actions (miscreants who feel butthurt because Mark exposed their wrongdoings are perpetrators, not victims), therefore there was no crime to investigate which reflected in the way the investigation was carried out.

The way Mark was investigated proves that they were not looking to resolve a crime, but merely to silence the man because they didn’t like that he told the truth. Afterall – what crime?

Stephen Camp had three options and tried each three to see which one would work in incriminating Mark:

• Terrorism
• Hate Propaganda
• Obscenity

Later on, Bill Clark – the guy who implied to the media that their goal was to censor the internet – added the obvious one to the attempts to incriminate Mark after his investigation revealed that in 2004, Mark bought pizza from a family run eatery in Vegreville, Alberta:

• Child Pornography

I wish I was kidding, but I’m not. That’s how desperate they were to get Mark and that only proves that they were not looking to resolve a crime – for Mark has never committed any – they were merely looking to incriminate Mark and tried everything they could in hopes that at least one of their tricks would work. I mean – where there is no victim, there is no crime, but in authoritarian regimes, if authorities want to get you, they will. In Canada, they wanted to get Mark, so they helped themselves. That he committed no crime? Who cares? They were ready to work something out anyway!

In a democratic country, if police involve you in an investigation, it would have a flair of:

We are investigating this crime that had happened and would like to talk to you to determine whether you may have been involved in it…

In Canada, as Mark’s case proves, it goes something like this:

You may have committed no crime, but we don’t like you and that’s all that matters. Thus, here I have a list of broadly defined laws that can be used almost indiscriminately against anyone and I’m gonna try to pin you with each of them one after another. Whether you like it or not, we’re gonna get you and there’s nothing you can do about it…

Female prosecutor who took the case had to work with the fact that of all the tricks tried, only the posting of the “1 Lunatic 1 Ice Pick‘ video actually worked but she still appeared to make no attempt to hide that she hated men and drew great pleasure from having one in her clutches. For her, to mention the 1 Lunatic 1 Ice Pick as the basis for the prosecution was mandatory, but as soon as she got that off her chest, she went on a long diatribe about posts on Best Gore featuring female victims. After she was done with her mandatory mention of Jun Lin, then it was all about placing maximum focus on female victims published on Best Gore and how horrible Mark was for allegedly posting them.

All that, however seemed normal to everyone in the court room – no present journalist, no present lawyer, nor members of the public picked up on the obvious anti male bias. And I didn’t either. It wasn’t until Mark pointed it out to me that one would have to really weed through the content on Best Gore to find a dozen of instances of posts featuring violence against women, given how rarely it occurs in comparison to violence against men. In other words, because Best Gore reflects the realistic image of the world, posts featuring violence against men are incomparably more frequent so one would have to ignore hundreds of posts with male victims in them in order to find a handful with women in them. Yet this is exactly what this female prosecutor must have done. It was so obvious, but because of societal misandry, I failed to see it. Luckily, Mark is still untainted by that bullshit.

And so with help from Vasily Kirov, Dr. Nasty and to a lesser degree also McTreblar, Mark put together a document outlining the obvious anti male bias of female prosecutors involved in his case and sent it to the Premier of Alberta Alison Redford. The letter was however sent with the fundamental realization that nothing would come out of it. It was sent simply because it needed to be sent.

After what we’ve seen happen to Mark we understand full well that everything Mark has told us on Best Gore is true – the system does not serve and protect the public. The system serves and protects the system at the expense of the public. It was a cooperative effort of a number of intergovernmental agencies to get Mark as they all felt butthurt by Mark’s disclosures.

Mark’s been under full prior restraint since July 2013 – total ban on any form of publishing, not just on Best Gore. He’s also prohibited from owning a computer, a phone or any other telecommunication device, barred from accessing the internet or attending an internet cafe and to prove that the whole system has been ordered to make his life unsustainable, all judges treat him like the most dangerous criminal in Alberta and refuse to allow him the means to defend himself against the charges. When Mark requested to have his unreasonably restrictive conditions varied, the judge refused to allow him access to his seize property, including his laptops and hard drives on which there is evidence crucial to his defence.

She also said that Mark didn’t need the internet to communicate, arguing that before there was internet, people communicated by other means and got by just fine. Yes – and before that they lit up pyres or didn’t communicate with anyone outside of the cave at all, and got by just fine. Just because something worked in the past when the world was much slower and basic survival did not depend on fast access to information, it doesn’t mean that one could just as easily get by today.

We are also aware that since the persecution started, Mark’s case has been passed through three prosecutors. Previous ones were taken off the case one after another apparently because they failed to keep Mark in jail. The decisions to change prosecutors came from the higher levels of the Alberta Government so we take it as a given that both the Premier of Alberta and the Alberta Minister of Justice would either have their hand directly in it, or be involved to some capacity, whether openly or discreetly.

Without further ado, here’s the excerpt from the letter sent to the Premier of Alberta by Mark Marek:

To: Alberta Premier Alison Redford, Room 307, Legislature Building, 10800-97 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T5K 2B6
Dated: 27th January, 2014

Dear Premier Redford

This letter is a petition on behalf of myself – Mark Marek, of Edmonton, Alberta to have the Crown Prosecutors and Probation Officers from the Department of Alberta Justice and Solicitor General investigated for possible abuse of power and gross professional misconduct.

The implied misconduct may have included targeted harm to my reputation, defamation, barratry, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, provision of false statements that lead to illegal denial of personal liberty and arbitrary imprisonment, failure to determine the lawfulness of the imprisonment, gender-related discrimination, chauvinism and misandry.

I further suspect that Crown Prosecutors Julie Roy and Cheryl Schlecker, as part of their gender-based discrimination aptitude, engaged in personal vendetta against me, violated my fundamental human rights, subjected me to a smear campaign, intentionally ignored evidence that I was innocent to ensure I would be likely to be imprisoned, treated me as guilty until proven innocent, and opposed my release not because they believed I was guilty, but because they like to demonize men and I promote egalitarianism, oppose sexism against men and advocate for social and legal equality.

As will be substantiated later in this document, I strongly believe that my persecution is a selective, politically motivated witch-hunt that is being employed to discredit me, as the prosecutors have failed to appreciate that my disclosures have triggered a necessary and long-delayed public debate about the acceptable boundaries of policing and gender equality in a democratic country.

I believe that Crown Prosecutors Julie Roy and Cheryl Schlecker, as well as Probation Officers Amanda Bell and another individual whose identity I have not been able to determine (Edmonton Central Intake Assistant Chief Probation Officer Ken Horrigan refused to reply to my request for disclosure) may have committed the abuses described, and call on the Premier of Alberta to have these individuals investigated and, if the allegation are found to be substantiated, punished appropriately.

About Me

I am the founder of the Best Gore website (www.bestgore.com), an independent media that exposes the grim and, often, un-savoury nature of humanity.

I established Best Gore in May 2008 with the goal to communicate uncensored information to the public. As a reporter, I operate outside of the politically correct system by investigating and uncovering what could be referred to as the “forbidden knowledge“. My disclosures frequently expose lies which were declared as official truth by the mainstream media.

Best Gore has millions of readers from all over the world, including doctors, lawyers, scientists, criminologists, forensic experts, pathologists, police officers, armed forces personnel and many others who study, observe and learn from the darker aspects of life and human nature.

In my quest to seek the truth no matter where the information leads me, I declined to follow the false left-right political paradigm and accompanied the content with commentary that initiates insightful discussions by making the readers contemplate their own humanity and life struggles.

Despite some natural differences of opinion which serve to promote discussion, my website provides a unique bridge to otherwise difficult to access information that leads the search for truth, liberty, justice, and peace.

Millions of Citizens Around the World rely on Best Gore for the Truth

The other side to freedom of expression is the right to information.

The right to freedom of information is based on the fundamental premise that a government is supposed to serve the people. Information has been called ‘the oxygen of democracy’, essential for openness, accountability and good governance.

Information makes it possible for people to make informed decisions about their own lives.

As a result of my prosecution, the millions who rely on my ability to expose the truth, are left without the sole source of information they trust; a ban that broadcasts Canada to the world as a leader (and horrifyingly, also a trendsetter) in prior censorship.

Corruption is caused by an absence of freely available information, and no ability for the public to hold corrupters accountable. Best Gore supports people to access the information needed to hold corrupters to account.

I strongly believe that the charges against me flatly contradict international standards on freedom of expression and information.

Attempts to obstruct my freedom of movement, my right to seek asylum, including the confiscation of my passport and electronic devices, and other forms of retaliation also violate Canada’s obligations under international law.

I further believe that the tendency of the Canadian government towards obsessively controlling information flow and an aversion to public discourse is both undemocratic, and unsustainable, in the digital era.

Taken together, I conclude that these actions have set a dangerous precedent for freedom of expression and the protection of reporters and journalists worldwide.

I am seriously concerned that governments will subsequently use the Canadian precedent to justify attacks on journalists and bloggers who put themselves at significant risk to expose or report government wrong-doing, corruption, or other dangers to society.

During most of human history, freedom of expression, as a fundamental human right was curtailed by dictatorships and authoritarian institutions. Only petty dictators and their enforcers still suppress freedom of expression today.

Punishing the Alleged Crime vs Silencing a Dissenting Voice

Upon careful review of my bail conditions I have concluded that my persecution has very little to do with punishing the alleged crime, but is instead used as a cover-up for the prosecution’s ultimate goal – to censor my reporting in order to silence me and keep me silenced.

Considering the maximum focus applied to ensuring that I am deprived of any and all means of modern communication, necessary for healthy development and normal survival in today’s society, it is easy to see that my persecution is not about keeping the community safe, but about getting even and showing authority.

Given that I am not accused of a violent crime, the provision that I have to surrender myself to jail for the preliminary hearing and trial further shows that the prosecutors enjoy the show of authority.

It is indeed saddening that the authorities would spare no public resource for the service and protection of the civilians after Best Gore brought Luka Magnotta to their attention, but spare no expense to silence an inconvenient reporter, put him in jail, put him on trial and tailor the conditions in such a way so as to maximize the damage to his reputation.

In the world we live in, there are oppressors, there are the oppressed and then there are those who step up to defend the oppressed. To ensure I get promenaded in the orange jumpsuit as much as possible, in order to enhance the humiliation and make an example of me for my audacity to step up to the defence of the oppressed, is an act of tyranny. It is a proof that prosecutors pressed charges against me not because they needed to, but because they wanted to and because they could.

Dedication to Honesty, Opposition to Deceit

On its disclaimer page (http://www.bestgore.com/disclaimer/) Best Gore has the following statement:

BestGore.com serves as a portal accommodating discussions on various topics involving real life events. Topics are suggested through posts which, with sole intention to stimulate discussion, contain purposefully exaggerated, blown out of proportion, try-hard offensive, or fabricated commentary.

As Best Gore is a study into human nature, and the ability of an individual to cope with and adapt to stressful, life shattering situations, the commentary including all accompanying written matter (titles, captions, descriptions, tags, etc.) strive to simulate language used by normal people during the normal course of their lives.

Because polished, reserved, or downright diplomatic talk is not natural and certainly not what ordinary people use within the privacy of their homes or within the circles of their trusted friends, the use of such language does not evoke responses that reflect their true nature. Instead, it evokes responses of the mask behind which they choose to hide.

In order to engage the readers in conversations which reflect who they really are, Best Gore makes them feel like they ARE within the privacy of their homes or within the circles of their trusted friends. This makes reporting and interactions sincere and that in turns provides us with a picture of who the people of the world really are and what they really feel like.

For example, just because a person is vocal about publically denouncing sexual exploitation of children, it doesn’t necessarily mean that deep below this mask of upstanding, honorable warrior for the rights of vulnerable children, lies an unsuspected predator. It is easy to sustain pretense when everyone around you is pretentious and hides behind a mask of their own.

In order to inspire individuals to take off their masks, to reveal the skeletons in their closets, one must first level with them, and remain on the level through the good, the bad and the ugly.

Best Gore achieves this by publishing sincere reports which reflect the reporters’ true feeling, instead of opting for a tone, or picking a side which is the most likely to make the reporter a winner of a popularity contest, by never beating about the bush and by always calling a spade a spade.

What this openness and sincerity brings in return, is a true reflection of humanity.

Needless to say, one can’t be open and sincere if they’re concerned with being perceived as lewd, crude or vulgar. Being lewd, crude and vulgar is who the people are when they think the world is not watching, ie when they are being them true selves.

There are way too many internet portals that foster pretense and dishonesty. Best Gore chose to pave the way for honesty and integrity. But of course, you can have neither honesty nor integrity if you hide behind a façade of white-knighting; acting like it is your virtuous, God given right to cast the first stone.

Even Detective Stephen Camp of the Edmonton Police Service, who interrogated me, recognized that the only way to make people open up, is by putting moral faggotry aside and talk with me the way people talk when they think the world is not looking – by being lewd, crude and vulgar.

By reviewing the video of the interrogation, you would hear Detective Camp repeatedly use swear words and other foul language – similar type of language used on Best Gore for the very same purpose: to incite the readers to being their real selves.

The prosecution used this occasional lewd, crude and vulgar language used on Best Gore to make the readers to open up, to justify pressing charges against me. Yet I fail to see how that is any different from Detective Camp using lewd, crude and vulgar language to make me to open up.

Besides – Best Gore as a website is just a messenger. It reports on real life events which happened in various places on the planet we occupy. If an individual commits a repulsive act, describing it with subtle and delicate language would be deceitful. It is the act itself that’s repulsive.

To hold a messenger accountable for truthfully describing a disgusting event using language that doesn’t downplay the severity of the act is how Best Gore ensures that unsuspected internet users are not tricked into landing on the website. Imagine that instead of truthfully describing what the image depicts by stating “A Girl With Sugar Cane Rammed Up Her Snatch”, the reporters would instead title the image “A Girl in a Sugar Cane Field”…

Would you as an internet user rather be deceived with inadequately subtle and delicate title into clicking on the link, not suspecting it contained a graphic image, or be hinted with lewd, crude and vulgar language that what you’d find on the page if you clicked the link would be equally lewd, crude and vulgar?

Sexism and Gender Based Discrimination

While alleged posting of the 1 Lunatic 1 Ice Pick video has been used as the basis for prosecution, female prosecutors Julie Roy and Cheryl Schlecker placed significant focus on making the entire BestGore.com website appear illegal.

Shockingly, of all-together twelve examples of “various manners of death or the aftermath of the death” as cited in the court hearing by the female prosecutors, only such examples of violence as perpetrated against women were used. As if violence against men was nothing to be concerned with.

As a reality news website, BestGore.com reports on real life events as they occur and as such, offers a very realistic reflection of what really goes on in various places around the world. That men become victims of violent crime far more often than women can be witnessed on BestGore.com more so than on any other news portal, however this is also supported by official statistics:

According to Iraq and Afghanistan Coalition Casualty Count Organization and Military Defense Link, men account for 97% of combat deaths. According to the Merck Manuals – trusted medical and scientific information handbooks, and the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, men account for 80% of suicide victims and 93% of industrial deaths and accidents (U.S. Department of Labor also reports the same percentage). According to the Homicide Survey by Statistics Canada, Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, 71% of homicide victims in Canada are male. As of November 2013, the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation figures say in the USA, 76% of homicide victims are male.

Given the overwhelming predominance of violence against men as opposed to violence against women in real life, one would need to spend a lot of time cherry picking through posts on BestGore.com to weed away the pervading murders, executions, beatings to death, sexual mutilations, sodomizations, torture and other unspeakable savagery perpetrated on men, to find a dozens of instances of what is in comparison significantly lesser in severity and level of cruelty aggression against women.

To blatantly and studiously ignore violence against men as something not worthy of one’s time is a way sexists marginalize and criminalize male identity.

They loudly and abundantly make it clear that owing simply to the fact that one’s a man, he’s by default worthless, that he’s most likely a rapist, that he’s violent and is an oppressor of women. And of course he’s also unfeeling and therefore his arbitrary imprisonment and any further mistreatment that follows are justified.

These are the type of women who think that every man is a retrograde, infantile, stupid, inferior, lesser human, on the simple ground that he’s a man.

It’s because of sexist women like Julie Roy and Cheryl Schlecker, that prevailing violence perpetrated against men has not only become socially acceptable, but when the person performing the violence is female, as reflected in courts and in the entertainment media, the violence is considered funny and amusing.

It’s because of women like Julie Roy and Cheryl Schlecker that kicking a man in the balls is considered a staple of comedy and everyone is expected to laugh when it’s depicted in video or photos. Mutilation of sexual organs is also considered funny and often referred to as such – as long as the victim of sexual mutilation is a man.

Promotion of the “men are at fault” thinking by individuals who trump up violence against women while downplaying violence toward men contributes to increasing toxicity, hatred and legally and socially accepted violence toward men.

As a man, I am treated neither by convention and clearly also not by law as equal human being with rights.

Whom Does Alberta Justice Serve?

As an individual who was born in Europe and spent 5 years travelling around the world, I am appalled by the realization that the Alberta prosecutors don’t care one bit about the innocence or guilt of the accused in their clutches. From my first hand experience I can say with utmost certainty that all they care about are their conviction rates. The higher their conviction rate, the greater their success even if every person convicted is innocent. This makes Canada the worst place in the world to live in for a law abiding civilian.

Because my case has garnered quite the attention from the mainstream media, I seemed to have become a coveted target for the prosecutors who appear to treat me as their opportunity to gain name recognition via the name of their victim.

That brought me to the pertinent questions:

• Why does the Alberta justice system serve political ambitions of prosecutors, but does not serve justice?
• Why does lust of Alberta prosecutors to boost their egos through high conviction rate take precedent to serving the public good?
• Why is a non violent Albertan, who has never caused harm or loss, nor a possibility of harm or loss treated as guilty until proven innocent?
• Why is an average Albertan a subject to criminal enquiry by virtue of being in Alberta?
• Why does Alberta create an environment of fear whereby it doesn’t matter whether one abides fully by law or not, for when authorities want to destroy him, they can, and they will?
• Why does Alberta allow for an unlimited open season on civilians with prosecutors able to “shoot to kill” at will, with privileged impunity, allowing them to get away with destroying innocent lives in exchange for just saying “oops, we got it wrong”?

To Sum Myself Up

Freedom of expression, and also access to information should not be a privilege, but a fundamental human right.

Full unrestricted enjoyment of this right is crucial to preempt oppression, maintain democracy and achieve individual freedoms.

Censorship is essential to tyranny because the abuse of power, which is embodied in censorship, can open doors to all the other abuses of power.

Attacks on, harassment, threats, imprisonment and silencing of journalists and reporters pose a very significant threat to independent and investigative journalism, to freedom of expression and to the flow of information to the public.

Complicity by government and police in these attacks is a gross abuse of power.

Because free, unhampered transmissions of thought, including criticism of government, administrations and institutions are imperative to the advance of the world toward true freedom and the spiritual well being of mankind, to ensure that we can enjoy both in perpetuity, authorities must be stopped from inhibiting and preventing critical voices under the guise of protecting the community.

At this time, I remain restrained from expressing opinions which I hold; an act known as prior censorship, even though they do not advocate or condone personal violence.

It Is With That In Mind That I Call on the Premier of Alberta to Take the Following Actions

1. Initiate and oversee an investigation of Probation Officers involved in the breach of bail conditions report against me for falsity, fraudulence and defamation.
2. Initiate and oversee an investigation of Crown Prosecutors Julie Roy and Cheryl Schlecker for possible gender based discrimination, misandry, chauvinism, sexism, marginalization and demonization of men.
3. Initiate and oversee an investigation of Crown Prosecutors Julie Roy and Cheryl Schlecker for possible wrongful, intentional and malicious initiation of criminal proceedings, and for being overly officious in instigating prosecution of groundless litigation for the purposes of profit or harassment, with a corrupt or malicious intent to distress, vex and annoy.
4. Initiate and oversee an investigation of the Correctional Officers at Edmonton Remand Centre as to why I was not provided with a mattress and had to spend a night sleeping on a steel plate, and why my release was delayed by almost two days after my bail had been posted.
5. Initiate and oversee an investigation of Edmonton Central Intake Assistant Chief Probation Officer Ken Horrigan for refusal to respond to the requests from the member of the public for full disclosure of the names of persons implicated in alleged abuses of fundamental human rights.
6. Initiate an executive public consultation on the activities of all Prosecutors and Probation Officers involved in the arrest, detention and case against me.
7. Initiate and oversee an investigation of the Correctional Officers at Edmonton Remand Centre as to why my correctly addressed correspondence was withheld and why, seven months later, it has still not been forwarded to me, when both my residential address and the address of my Lawyer are known to prosecuting authorities.
8. Commit to seeking the redefinition of the Alberta Police Act from discriminatory and unconstitutional edicts that favour and protect abuses of power, to moral standards respective of a democratic society. The legislation should not discriminate against those persons who lack the financial means to purchase a phone, nor should it discriminate against individuals with an auditory impairment who do not have a mobile telephone or landline because they’re unable to communicate by these means. Finally, and most importantly, if I, as an individual, am witness to police brutality, the current legislation seeks to invalidate any complaint I submit. This is obscene; as the victim may be too frightened of the system and process to complain; the legislation should be re-written in such a way so as not to afford abusive officers the ability to mistreat citizens without consequences.
9. Support the redefinition of Section 163 from vaguely worded edicts, whose scope is unreasonably broad, to standards of clarity and precision so that people can foresee the consequences of their actions.
10. Support the adoption of a strong and robust “media shield law” with narrow exemptions for national security information in accordance with the Johannesburg Principles.

Civil right to freedom of expression is not only important, but also necessary for the preservation of other human rights, such as prevention of torture or other inhuman treatment; both of which I helped to expose when they occurred.

If freedom of expression is suppressed, the ability to identify other Human Rights violations is eroded.

The hallmark of a democratic society is freedom of expression.

Suppression of expression, ideas and concerns, on the other hand, is a hallmark of a tyrannical or repressive government.

I thank you for your understanding and am looking forward to a more democratic Canada.

Yours sincerely,

Mark Marek

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• Scat Sex Caption Contest
• childp orn
• childporn com
• gore chile porn

The information I found on the interwebs regarding this event was a bit conflicting but the thing they all agreed with was that this poor dude got his penis cut off by his girlfriend for having allegedly cheated on her. It happened in São Paulo, Brazil.

On a particular website it said the girlfriend tied him to the bed in order to engage in some sort of sexual fantasy. After tying him real tight, she grabbed a sawing knife and cut his dick off. But considering I only found this information in one place, I can’t fully confirm it’s authenticity.

The medical team tried to reattach the penis but there was no saving it. The man barely survived but will have to use a catheter for the rest of his life, if you can call it that.

I bet some feminists are having a laugh at this because in their minds he must have deserved it. Because every man who cheats deserves to have his penis cut off and face a massive hemorrhage and possibly even death due to blood loss. Yeah, that’ll teach him…

Wanna know how I know this? In 2011 on an American TV show called “The Talk”, a similar case of a man who had his penis cut off and thrown in the trash by his wife (Catherine Kieu Becker) was addressed. The reason? He wanted to divorce her. All the feminist cunts, the hosts, and a feminist filled audience laughed at that poor man who almost lost his life.

Societal Misandry is stronger than ever yet most people turn a blind eye to it. How far will it go before men decide to put a stop to it, to acknowledge that we are not a laughing stock, that we are not mere machines who serve the sole purpose of work and providing for families? Or will we just continue to carry this burden in order to comply to the “politically and socially correct” that we just have to “toughen up and take it like a man because women are the eternal victims and we are the eternal oppressors”?

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• penis beating
• man cutting the head of his penis off on a video
• hot sexy naked man cutting his dick off
• biting dick off gore
• extreme gore fick cut off videos
• xvideos/male forced testicles shot off
• Mexican cuts of mans head and penis
• man cuts off own penis head video
• male genital mutilation bedt gore
• male cock visously cut

I understand disciplining your child to beat sense into her when she posts naked pictures of herself on Facebook to prevent the whole world from getting blamed for her suicide, but taking out your frustration upon your own children just because they can’t fight back, that’s low.

This video was secretly filmed in Sucre, Colombia on April 4, 2014. It captured a mother brutally beating her two sons with what looks like a large wooden spoon. As they’re being beaten senseless, the boys raise their arms trying to fend off the heavy blows, but the woman just kept throwing more and more.

An ombudsman from the Colombian Institute of Family Welfare said their institution has dealt with 13,670 cases of child abuse in just the first three months of this year. This was one of those cases.

It could also be the case of a feminism tainted woman expressing her inbred hatred for men the way feminists do, by targeting her own children. It is also a statistically and scientifically proven fact that mothers abuse children more often than fathers.

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• brutal rape before torture
• female torture gallery

This video embodies everything that’s wrong with the world dominated by societal misandry.

If while watching this video you thought to yourself:

• What a loser
• The guy must be impotent
• He’s probably gay

…or any of the many variants, then you come from a world dominated by female privilege and you’ve been indoctrinated to embrace it unconditionally – you accept it as something normal.

Societal misandry mandates that egalitarianism is sexist, therefore holding a woman to the same standard as a man, is sexist. Thus, if a woman was beaten by a man for refusing his predatory sexual advances, you would not be accepted by the herd unless you explicitly condemned his disgusting behavior and called for him to be castrated, charged with rape and constantly beaten in jail.

But if a man is beaten by a woman for refusing her predatory sexual advances, then the joke is on the man. Consequently, you would not be accepted by the herd unless you explicitly mocked the man, and questioned his sexuality, his sexual potency and his capability to bear the title of man.

Such level of societal anomaly fosters the epidemic of fake female rape victims, while maintaining zero tolerance for men’s issues. It’s time to transform men from “human doings” back into “human beings”, and put an end to NAWALT bullshitry.

If you caught yourself laughing at the man assaulted by the female sexual predator in the video, then there is but one thing I could say that you would understand: “Baah, Ba, Baa, Bah, Baaaaaaaaaaaa!”

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• galori sex woman brizilon
• maidan real rape video
• pussy assult pic
• rape girl bestgore
• video of man sexual assault fish
• www best of the best video sex com
• www best south indian gorls sex
• xnxx best sexy pics

While circumstances surrounding this case are still incomplete and confusing, it’s already an exemplary case of societal misantry in the anti male world, whereby an abusive mother mistreats a child, but warrant is issued out for the father before mother’s wrong doing could possibly be considered. And if the father had no video proof, he’d be arbitrarily guilty because that’s how much it rocks being a male in the anti male world.

What is known is that after finding his child bruised in the house in Wilkinsburg, Pennsylvania, the child’s father – David Bryant Jr., called police and told them the child’s mother – 22 year old Dalishia Salter had hurt the baby.

But Dalishia Salter in turn told police that the child was bruised because David Bryant pushed a flatscreen television off of a bedroom dresser and it hit the child.

Doctors from Children’s Hospital treated the baby and said “the child had a tear inside his mouth from an object being shoved with great force…” and that “the child had suffered from multiple injuries over a period of time, because you could see various forms of healing on the child’s face and head.”

Yet despite all that, it’s the father that faces assault charges simply because the woman said he dropped the TV on the child. Welcome to the anti male world where woman always receives preferential treatment and man has to go way out of his way just to receive a hint of justice. Luckily this one has the video which may soon enough swing things in his favor. Check out the scan of the police complaint HERE.

In the video you can hear the father just seething with rage, which is fair considering that he’d just found his 11 months old child bruised, bleeding, and left out in cold, but holding back.

Then, to make the video even weirder, as the child whimpered, the mother pulled out what looks like a wig out of the toilet… WTF?

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• bestgore com of mother abuse
• gore abusef

There’s so much wrong with the simple statement that a 10 year old was beaten bloody for allegedly raping a 5 year old, that I can’t even believe it could be said, let alone entertain the possibility of it being true. Yet that’s exactly what happened and it was filmed on video.

The little boy in the video is only 10 years old. He was accused of raping his 5 year old neighbor. Take a look at how little he is – he probably doesn’t even understand what the hell rape is, and has no concept yet of there being any other use to his pee pee, beside peeing when one drinks too much water.

In a Brazilian style street lynching, the boy was surrounded by older (thus stronger) guys who beat him bloody with flip flops.

That Brazil is pussy whipped has been documented at Best Gore extensively. But this goes way beyond false rape accusations. I wonder if perhaps the kids played “doctors” the way all kids in that age do, and a feminazi, who sees exerting pain and suffering upon all boys and men for being boys and men as the sole purpose of her existence, immediately accused him of rape. In pussy whipped countries, when a man is accused of rape, regardless of how ridiculous the accusation is, and even if there is undisputed evidence that the accusation is a fabrication, the man still pays the price.

Few things are as sickening as feminism.

What People Searched For To Land Here:

• best gore pics brutal beatings
• Africa rape old women xnxx
• rape murder video porn
• rape of the dead porn pictures anime
• raped teen gllery
• real rape girl pics
• sa uncut black pussy
• sex rape video dawnload photo
• World top rap bestgore photo gallary
• pussy rape sex